Vioxx lawsuit verdict $47.5 million

Today a New Jersey jury awarded $47.5 million in a Vioxx lawsuit filed after the popular pain killer caused a heart attack for an Idaho postal worker.  The jury found that Vioxx caused the Plaintiff’s heart attack and that the drug maker acted in a fraudulent manner by misrepresenting the drug’s heart risks.  Nearly 30,000 Vioxx lawsuits are still pending nationwide, and there may more victims who still have additional time to file their claim.

>>RELATED POST: Vioxx statute of limitations

Vioxx has been blamed for causing heart attacks, strokes and premature death in patients who were taking the arthritis drug to manage their chronic pain.  Vioxx lawsuits are being pursued as a result of the drug maker’s failure to properly research their product or warn of the potentially fatal side effects.  Complaints allege that Merck continued to market and sell the drug until September 2004, despite their knowledge of the serious risks.

The Vioxx litigation is still in its early stages, as this case is one of the first 15 to go to trial.  Individual Vioxx cases do have challenges since many of the claims involve patients who had other risk factors for a heart attack or stroke before they took the drug.  However, across the country several of the early jury verdicts returned have been against Merck, holding them responsible for the injuries suffered and awarding millions of dollars in compensation on each case.

In several trials, Merck has also been found in violation of the New Jersey state consumer-protection statute.  In those cases, punitive damages were  awarded as a result of Merck’s conduct which was determined to be “oppressive, outrageous or malicious” by misrepresenting the risks associated with Vioxx.

VIOXX LAWSUITS

Although the statute of limitations for filing a Vioxx lawsuit has expired in many states, the lawyers at Saiontz & Kirk, P.A. are still reviewing potential claims for individuals who have not yet retained an attorney.  Many individuals decided not to hire an attorney after the recall since they questioned whether Merck could be blamed for their heart attack or stroke.   Even though it has been more than two years since the recall, additional time may be available under the statute of limitations to file new Vioxx lawsuits in certain states.  If you, a friend or family member suffered injuries after taking Vioxx, compensation may still be available.  However, for many claims there may only be a few months left to investigate the case and get it filed in court.  To speak with one of our Vioxx lawyers and determine if additional time is still available to pursue your claim, request a free claim evaluation.

Leave a Reply

  1. (required)
  2. (valid email required)
  3. I authorize the above comments to be posted on this page?
  1. If you wish to have an attorney review your comments and contact you to review a potential case, please provide additional contact information.
    The information below will not be published and will be kept 100% confidential.
 

cforms contact form by delicious:days

Additional Information and Lawsuit Resources

MRI Lawsuit
MRI Contrast Lawsuits

Gadolinium contrast used during MRI and MRA could cause Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) among those with kidney problems.

More MRI Lawsuit Info

Chantix Lawsuits
Denture Cream Problems

Fixodent lawsuits and Super PoliGrip lawsuits are being filed for denture wearers who suffered zinc poisoning, neuopathy and other injuries.

Denture Cream Lawsuit Info

Yamaha Rhino Rollover Lawsuits
DePuy ASR Hip Replacement

The DePuy ASR metal-on-metal hip implant has been associated with a higher-than-expected rate of hip failures and other painful hip problems.

More DePuy ASR Hip Lawyer Info

Yasmin and Yaz problems
Yasmin and Yaz Side Effects

The popular birth control pills Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella have been linked to an increased risk of serious and potentially life-threatening injuries that were not adequately warned about.

More Yaz Lawsuit and Yasmin lawsuit Info