Product Liability Lawsuit Verdicts Up in 2009: Report

Last year, there was a substantial increase in the size of the largest product liability jury awards against big businesses, including two major punitive damage awards in hormone replacement therapy lawsuits against Pfizer’s Prempro, which seem to reflect an American public that is fed up with corporate abuses.

>>INFORMATION: Product Liability Lawsuits

According to an analysis by Bloomberg News, there was a 52 percent increase in the total value of the top five product defect lawsuit verdicts of 2009, when compared to the previous year. The verdicts seem to indicate that jurors are more inclined to take the side of their fellow citizens amidst the pain of the economic recession, the blame for which many people lay at the feet of Wall Street and big business.

Among the largest jury awards in product liability lawsuits last year that were identified by Bloomberg, were two losses by Pfizer over its hormone replacement therapy drug, Prempro. Pfizer was hit with a combined punitive damage award of $103 million in two Prempro lawsuits, in which women claimed that the drug maker intentionally hid the risk of breast cancer, putting profits before the safety of consumers.

The lawsuits may be just the start of Pfizer’s Prempro woes, with more than 9,000 other hormone replacement therapy lawsuits pending against Pfizer’s Wyeth subsidiary. All of the lawsuits involve allegations that women developed breast cancer as a result of the company’s failure to adequately warn consumers and the medical community about the risks associated with hormone replacement therapy.

In another major lawsuit highlighted in the Bloomberg analysis, jurors hit Altria, a Virginia tobacco company that owns Phillip Morris, with a $300 million verdict in a lawsuit by a former smoker who developed cancer. The lawsuit included $244 million in punitive damages; the largest punitive damages award in 2009.

Overall, five of the 50 largest court verdicts in 2009 nationwide concerned allegedly defective products, compared to only one such case which made the top 50 in 2008.

The verdicts reflect a souring mood of the public toward big business, and hopefully these verdicts are being looked at by corporate executives. Consumers are angry with corporate America, and these large verdicts are likely to continue if companies do not start recognizing that they can not place consumer safety at risk to generate additional revenue for their bottom line.

PRODUCT LIABILITY LAWYERS

The product liability lawyers at Saiontz & Kirk, P.A. investigate potential claims for severe injuries caused by dangerous and defective products throughout the United States. If you, a friend or family member suspect that you may have a claim, request a free consultation and claim evaluation.

3 Responses to:

“Product Liability Lawsuit Verdicts Up in 2009: Report”

  1. MARY Says:

    HOW LONG ARE WE AS UN-KNOWING PATIENTS WILLING TO LET THE PHARMACUITAL CO. AND DOCTORS KILL AND MAME OURSELF AND FAMILY MEMBERS BEFORE WE TAKE A STAND? THERE IS NO EXCUSE NOW , THANK GOD FOR ATTORNEYS THAT WILL FIGHT FOR US .THIS IS NOT JUST COMPENSATION READERS THIS IS REAL LIFES…PLEASE STAND UP AND LET CONGRESS ,PHARMICATALS,AND DRS. KNOW WE HAD ENOUGH !!!!

  2. JIM Says:

    Mary, you are so right. The pursuit of profits by big Pharma is revealing it to be fraud ridden and downright criminal. With some victories of late with large Punitives it may stir more remorse. The only way to attack is to sue and sue. The board of directors will see the light only when the bottom line is affected. My concern is that with Prempro and Premarin, the companies are simply trying to delay and hope most of the 10K claimants will die.

  3. Robert Says:

    Wright Medical Group Inc. is one of the largest manufacturer’s of knee and hip components. I had a total hip replacement and the component fracturered in the femur STEM – not the component. Legal has advised me that Wright is FDA approved and protected. Victims such as myself have no recourse when injured as a result of using one of these implants. You think FDA approved would make you confident in using the produce – CONSUMER BEWARE. Please contact your local representatives and demand that they support the MEDICAL DEVICE SAFETY DEVICE ACT BILL. Of course this bill is on the back burner as our government officials try to fix the health care system. Let’s start with making medical manufacturers of devices liable.

Leave a Reply

  1. (required)
  2. (valid email required)
  3. I authorize the above comments to be posted on this page?
  1. If you wish to have an attorney review your comments and contact you to review a potential case, please provide additional contact information.
    The information below will not be published and will be kept 100% confidential.
 

cforms contact form by delicious:days

Additional Information and Lawsuit Resources

MRI Lawsuit
MRI Contrast Lawsuits

Gadolinium contrast used during MRI and MRA could cause Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) among those with kidney problems.

More MRI Lawsuit Info

Chantix Lawsuits
Denture Cream Problems

Fixodent lawsuits and Super PoliGrip lawsuits are being filed for denture wearers who suffered zinc poisoning, neuopathy and other injuries.

Denture Cream Lawsuit Info

Yamaha Rhino Rollover Lawsuits
DePuy ASR Hip Replacement

The DePuy ASR metal-on-metal hip implant has been associated with a higher-than-expected rate of hip failures and other painful hip problems.

More DePuy ASR Hip Lawyer Info

Yasmin and Yaz problems
Yasmin and Yaz Side Effects

The popular birth control pills Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella have been linked to an increased risk of serious and potentially life-threatening injuries that were not adequately warned about.

More Yaz Lawsuit and Yasmin lawsuit Info