Jump to Navigation

Medtronic Infuse BMP Cancer Risk

Austin Kirk

In recent years, there have been increasing concerns over the risk of cancer from the Medtronic Infuse bone growth protein. The product liability lawyers at Saiontz & Kirk, P.A. are evaluating the potential for Medtronic Infuse cancer lawsuits on behalf of individuals diagnosed with:

  • Breast Cancer
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Other Cancer or Tumor

Potential claims are also being investigated on behalf of individuals who experienced nerve damage, inflammation, respiratory problems and other complications following Medtronic Infuse BMP surgery, which may have been caused by excess bone growth around the spine.

To review a potential lawsuit for yourself, a friend or family member request a free consultation and claim evaluation.

Medtronic Infuse Cancer Side Effects

Medtronic Infuse Cancer Lawyers

Have You or a Loved One Experienced Medtronic Infuse Problems?

REVIEW A CASE

Medtronic Infuse is a genetically engineered protein, known as rhBMP-2, which is often implanted into the spine to encourage bone growth and fusion of vertebrae in the spine.

During spinal surgery, Medtronic Infuse is only approved for the limited use during single-level, lumbar fusions involving an anterior approach. However, the product has been widely used off-label for other types of back surgeries, which may increase the risk of complications and side effects.

Both federal and independent studies have suggested that side effects of Medtronic Infuse BMP may increase the risk of cancer, as the genetically engineered protein used in Infuse could be a cancer-causing agent.

In 2010, the FDA issued a report on a proposed Medtronic bone product known as Amplify, which also used rhBMP-2. The report found that Amplify recipients had a 5% cancer rate, compared to 1.8% for a control group. Since both Amplify and Infuse use the same protein, concerns surfaced about whether Infuse patients also showed a higher cancer rate.

In November 2011, Dr. Eugene Carragee, editor-in-chief of the Spine Journal, announced findings in a study he conducted that appeared to demonstrate a link between Infuse and increased cancer rates. The study’s findings were announced at a meeting of the North American Spine Society.

Carragee indicated that while Infuse may not be a carcinogen itself, it is tied to a higher rate of cancer among recipients and could be a cancer promoter. The findings suggested that spine surgery patients who receive Medtronic Infuse may be 2.5 times more likely to develop cancer within a year, when compared to those who did not receive Infuse during spinal surgery. The increased risk increased by a factor of five over three years.

Cancers linked to Infuse in the study included breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer.

MEDTRONIC INFUSE CANCER LAWSUITS

The Medtronic Infuse lawyers at Saiontz & Kirk, P.A. represent individuals throughout the United States who are pursuing a product liability lawsuit after experiencing nerve damage and other problems caused by excess bone growth around the spine following a fusion surgery. However, it appears that individuals diagnosed with cancer after Medtronic Infuse BMP surgery may also be entitled to pursue financial compensation.

The potential for litigation over the manufacturer’s failure to adequately warn about the Medtronic Infuse BMP cancer risk is being actively investigated and reviewed by our law firm. As part of our evaluation, we are interested in speaking with individuals diagnosed with cancer after receiving a Medtronic Infuse bone graft implant.

After providing a free consultation and claim evaluation, if it is determined that a lawsuit will be pursued for cancer from Infuse, there are no fees or expenses unless our lawyers are successful obtaining a recovery in your case.

CONTACT OUR LAWYERS ABOUT A MEDTRONIC INFUSE CANCER LAWSUIT

1 Comment Add Your Comments

  1. I had a spinal fusion to my l5-s1 vertebrae, but the surgeon entered from the back. Needless to say this has been a catastrophe for me. I do not know which kind of bone was used, I do know that the Dr. told me He would not be harvesting my bone, but it was better to use medically produced bone. I had my surgery in 2007 then in 2008 had to have all devices removed because of excessive scarring tissue they told me, it still did not work and I am left disabled, in pain each day of my life with little relief, and have went through numerous procedures to alleviate the pain to no avail. I am left basically unable to perform any of my duties, or even ride in a vehicle without the pain going to the point of being bed ridden for several days. I do receive a lot of pain medication, and it does help some.

Leave a Reply

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide contact information below and additional private comments if you want an attorney to contact you to review a potential case.
    The information below will not be published and will be confidential.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Additional Information & Lawsuit Resources

Maryland Accident Lawyers

Our personal injury lawyers handle auto accidents, truck accidents and other serious cases.

Maryland Accident Information
Actos Bladder Cancer

Side effects of Actos, a popular diabetes drug, may increase the risk of bladder cancer.

Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuits
Hip Replacement Lawsuits

Pursuing product liability lawsuiits for problems from a number of metal-on-metal hip systems.

DePuy ASR Hip Recall Info
Transvaginal Mesh Lawyers

Vaginal mesh used to repair POP and SUI can cause serious and severe complications.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Info