Drug eluting stent advice offered by SCAI

Austin Kirk

By Austin Kirk
Posted January 14, 2007

ADD YOUR COMMENTS 3

A clinical alert was issued by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) to provide drug eluting stent recommendations and advice to physicians.  The alert is intended to help reduce the risk of medicated stent blood clots and heart attacks, which can occur months or even years after the stents are implanted.

The SCAI’s membership includes nearly all of the specialists who implant cardiac stents, known as interventional cardiologists.  Over the past several months concerns have grown among the medical community and patients regarding stent dangers, which could lead to serious and potentially fatal injuries for patients who receive the devices.  Given the questions surrounding stent problems, the SCAI felt that it was important to provide practical drug eluting stent advice and guidance to the medical community.

>>INFORMATION: Drug eluting stent problems

Since drug coated stents were first introduced in 2003, they have grown to dominate the stent market, accounting for nearly 90% of all stents implanted.  Stents are small wire mesh devices placed inside of previously blocked arteries to keep them open.  Drug eluting stents were designed to prevent the build up of scar tissue inside the artery, which helps reduce the rate of restenosis, or narrowing of the artery which can lead to another blockage.  However, an unintended side effect which the manufacturers failed to warn about is the increased risk of late stent thrombosis, or the formation of blood clots which can lead to heart attacks and death.  Many have questioned whether the dangers of drug coated stents outweigh the benefits provided for many patients.

Drug eluting stent lawsuits are being investigated and reviewed for heart patients nationwide who have suffered blood clots, reclogging of the artery, heart attack or death.  The manufacturers failed to provide patients and physicians with the necessary information to make an informed decision about the balance between the risks of restenosis and the risk of late stent thrombosis, or blood clots.

The SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention) alert stresses the importance of the doctor and patient considering the risk-benefit ratio for each individual before the decision is made to implant a drug coated stent.  Previously, researchers have indicated that thousands of serious injuries and deaths have been caused by medicated stent side effects.  Some of the drug eluting stent advice and recommendations offered to reduce the risk of injury include:

  • Before a drug eluting stent is implanted, the patient should meet the accepted criteria for the devices.  (See recent post on 11/20/06: Medicated stent overuse leads to increased risk)  If a patient is not within the accepted criteria for the medicated stents, they are being exposed to the risk of stent problems when their particular condition may not require that procedure.
  • An individual analysis must be considered for each patient to determine whether it is best to treat the patient with drug eluting stents, bare metal stents or bypass surgery.  Relative risks and benefits of each therapy should be evaluated according to the patient’s medical history and current health.
  • Careful consideration should be given to a patient’s ability to adhere to long term therapy on an anti-clotting medication.  A patient’s failure to take the medication could dramatically increase the risk of serious and potentially fatal injuries as a side effect of medicated stents.  Therefore, unless a patient can reasonably be relied upon to take the medication consistently as directed, they should not be considered a candidate for a drug eluting stent.
  • Although the makers of the Taxus paclitaxel eluting stent and Cypher sirolimus eluding stent only recommend 3 to 6 months of anti-clotting medications, the FDA and SCAI have indicated that it is preferable for patients to continue on the drugs 12 months or longer, depending on their risk for late stent thrombosis.  Currently it is unclear exactly how long blood thinners should be taken, as many experts have expressed concern that Plavix side effects could lead to other injuries, including ulcers, internal bleeding, heart attacks and strokes.

DRUG ELUTING STENT ADVICE AND LAWSUITS

If you, a friend or family member have received a drug eluting stent and suffered a reclogging of the artery, blood clots, heart attack or death, you may qualify for a stent lawsuit.  To determine if you may be entitled to compensation, request a free claim evaluation.

3 Comments • Add Your Comments

  • Donald McCarty says:

    My husband has had stents aforementioned and is at this very day, in the hospital with a TIA and showering clots.

    He has been blind in his right eye since birth and only has use in his left eye, which became blurry, wavy lines, and watery. We were told to go to ER, for workup of stroke.

    He has multiple blood clots in the right eye, restricted blood flow in the left eye. They are currently doing tests on his heart. He has had bypass, 2 heart attacks,
    stents in his heart and legs.

    The Drs. are stumped since he has been on plavix, coumadin, and baby aspirin each and every day without fail for the last 6 years. He gets his INR done faithfully per Dr. orders.

    He has done everything he has been told to do. He wasn’t told the stents could cause blood clots, because of his condition, (and blood defiencies) he would never have consented.

    We are praying everything will work out, but he’s been there 2 days, and all we know is that they increased his coumadin and put him on heparin IV and still giving him a baby aspirin per day.

    If you have any questions, please contact me.

    Karen McCarty, wife

    Posted on January 20, 2007 at 12:01 am

  • Austin Kirk says:

    Kathy,

    Thank you for sharing your husband’s experiences. Saiontz, Kirk & Miles is investigating potential drug eluting stent lawsuits as a result of the manufacturers’ failure to warn of these dangers. We would be happy to review this further with you privately to determine if your husband may be eligible for a claim.

    If you have not done so already, you can request a free legal consultation and stent lawsuit evaluation by clicking here, or you can call our office toll free at (800) 522-0102.

    Austin P. Kirk, Esq.
    Saiontz, Kirk & Miles, P.A.

    Posted on January 21, 2007 at 10:38 pm

  • debbie garcia says:

    i had both taxus and cordis stents put in in late 2003 and late 2005. I am on plavix daily and have been since 12/2003. i have not experianced any problems so far but i am not in the financial positon to afford another hospital stay due to problems from either stents or side affects of plavix. i was given any information about the medicated stents other than the dr telling my husband after the fact that they had placed this wonderful new stent in my chest. now i am hearing other wise and am concerned about things i am hearing in the news

    Posted on February 1, 2007 at 5:50 pm

Add Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide contact information below and additional private comments if you want an attorney to contact you to review a potential case.

    The information below will not be published to this page.

  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.